Jury finds Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll in 1996, awarding her $5 million. The verdict, which rejected rape but upheld sexual assault, could impact Trump’s presidential campaign. Carroll’s vindication and Trump’s legal woes are highlighted. Emotional reactions, Trump’s outraged response, and lawyer statements are featured. The implications for Trump’s bid remain unclear.
The trial exposes Trump’s conduct toward women. Ongoing legal challenges and background information are discussed. Carroll’s allegations, Trump’s denials, and the lack of criminal charges are examined. The lawsuit, initially filed as defamation, underscores New York State’s law on old sexual assault claims.
Donald Trump News Jean Carroll Case:
Jury Finds Donald Trump Liable for Sexual Abuse of E. Jean Carroll in 1996
In a significant legal development, a jury has determined that former President Donald Trump is responsible for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll, an advice columnist, in 1996. The jury’s decision holds Trump accountable for his actions and marks a pivotal moment in Carroll’s pursuit of justice.
$5 Million Judgment Against Trump Could Impact His Presidential Campaign
The jury has awarded E. Jean Carroll a $5 million judgment as a result of the trial. This substantial financial penalty could have implications for Trump’s future political aspirations, particularly as he aims to regain the presidency. The judgment serves as a potential obstacle and may tarnish Trump’s image in the eyes of voters.
Mixed Verdict: Rape Claim Rejected, but Trump Held Responsible for Sexual Assault
Although the jury did not uphold Carroll’s claim of rape, they did find Donald Trump liable for a lesser degree of sexual assault. This mixed verdict acknowledges that Trump bears some responsibility for his actions, albeit not to the extent claimed by Carroll. It is crucial to note that the verdict does not absolve Trump of wrongdoing.
Vindication for E. Jean Carroll and Consequences for Trump
The jury’s judgment brings a sense of vindication for E. Jean Carroll. Her allegations of sexual abuse, which had been ridiculed and dismissed by Trump for years, are now affirmed by the jury’s decision. The verdict has legal repercussions for Trump and adds to the mounting legal challenges he faces, potentially affecting his future endeavors.
Emotional Reactions in the Courtroom
As the verdict was announced, E. Jean Carroll displayed visible signs of relief and joy. She nodded in agreement, hugged her supporters, and smiled through tears. The emotional weight of the trial was evident as Carroll laughed and cried after leaving the courtroom.
Trump Responds with Outrage, Promises to Appeal
In response to the verdict, Donald Trump immediately took to his social media platform, expressing his anger and denouncing the decision. He reiterated his denial of any knowledge or involvement with Carroll and labeled the verdict a “disgrace” and “a continuation of the greatest witch hunt of all time.” Trump vowed to appeal the decision, signaling his determination to contest the ruling.
Lawyers React to the Verdict and Trump’s Absence from the Trial
Joseph Tacopina, Trump’s lawyer, expressed his perplexity at the jury’s decision, noting the inconsistency between rejecting the rape claim while still holding Trump responsible for sexual assault. Tacopina defended Trump’s absence from the trial, citing concerns about the proceedings becoming a “circus.” He maintained Trump’s innocence, reiterating the former president’s denial of the allegations.
Carroll’s Statement: Seeking Justice and Clearing Her Name
Following the trial, E. Jean Carroll released a written statement expressing her motivation for suing Trump. She stated that her primary objectives were to clear her name and reclaim her life. Carroll emphasized that the verdict was not only a personal victory but also a triumph for all women who have endured disbelief when sharing their experiences.
Implications for Trump’s Presidential Bid Remain Unclear
The impact of the verdict on Donald Trump’s third presidential campaign remains uncertain. Despite his legal woes and controversies in the past, Trump has maintained a strong position among GOP contenders. The silence of his Republican rivals immediately after the verdict suggests a reluctance to alienate Trump’s supporters, who play a crucial role in securing the party’s nomination.
Carroll’s Allegations and Trump’s Denials
E. Jean Carroll is one of more than a dozen women who have accused Donald Trump of sexual assault or harassment. In 2019, Carroll publicly alleged that Trump had raped her in a dressing room of a high-end department store in Manhattan in 1996. Trump vehemently denied the allegations, claiming that he did not know Carroll and accusing her of fabricating the story to promote her memoir.
The Trial Highlights Trump’s Conduct Toward Women
The trial brought renewed attention to Donald Trump’s behavior and treatment of women. Carroll’s testimony, supported by the accounts of two friends, depicted Trump’s alleged assault. The jury also heard testimonies from other women, including Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff, who accused Trump of unwanted sexual advances. The infamous 2005 “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Trump made lewd remarks about women, was also presented as evidence.
Ongoing Legal Challenges for Trump
The verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s case adds to the legal challenges faced by Donald Trump. He is currently involved in a criminal case in New York related to hush money payments made to a porn actor. Additionally, the New York State Attorney General has filed a lawsuit against Trump, his family, and his business, alleging financial misconduct. Trump is also under investigation in various jurisdictions regarding possible mishandling of classified documents, his post-election actions, and his involvement in the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Trump maintains his innocence in all these matters.
Background on E. Jean Carroll and Her Encounter with Trump
E. Jean Carroll, known for her long-running advice column in Elle magazine, has had a career as a writer for various publications, including “Saturday Night Live.” She and Donald Trump were part of overlapping social circles and were photographed together at a party in 1987. Carroll alleges that in 1996, she ended up alone in a dressing room with Trump after encountering him at Bergdorf Goodman. The encounter took a disturbing turn when Carroll claims Trump sexually assaulted her.
Trump’s Inappropriate Comments and Judge’s Warning
During the trial, Donald Trump made inappropriate comments about the case through social media, referring to it as a “made up SCAM.” U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, unrelated to Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan, deemed Trump’s comments “entirely inappropriate” and cautioned him about potential legal consequences if he continued such behavior.
Defense Argues Carroll’s Claims Are Fabricated
Donald Trump’s lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, sought to discredit E. Jean Carroll’s claims during the trial. Tacopina argued that Carroll invented her allegations after watching a 2012 episode of “Law and Order” featuring a similar storyline. He claimed that Carroll lacked objective evidence to support her claims and accused her of pursuing a false rape allegation for monetary, political, and status-related motives.
No Possibility of Criminal Charges Against Trump
Due to the expiration of the legal time limit, there is no possibility of Donald Trump facing criminal charges for the alleged assault on E. Jean Carroll. The civil trial offered Carroll an opportunity to seek justice and hold Trump accountable through a different legal avenue.
Carroll’s Lawsuit Initially Filed as Defamation
Originally, E. Jean Carroll filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump, asserting that his denials of her allegations had harmed her reputation and caused her emotional distress. However, changes in New York state law allowed individuals to bring lawsuits for sexual assault claims that would otherwise be time-barred. Carroll subsequently amended her lawsuit to include a claim of sexual assault.
New York State Law Allows Lawsuits for Old Sexual Assault Claims:
New York State implemented changes to its laws that extended the statute of limitations for filing lawsuits related to sexual assault. These changes created an opportunity for individuals like E. Jean Carroll to bring legal action against their alleged perpetrators, even if the incidents occurred many years ago. Prior to these changes, the statute of limitations often barred victims from pursuing legal remedies after a certain period of time had elapsed.
This alteration in the law recognized the unique nature of sexual assault cases, where victims may face significant challenges in coming forward immediately due to factors such as trauma, fear, or societal stigma. By allowing individuals to file lawsuits for old sexual assault claims, New York State aimed to provide victims with a pathway to seek justice and hold their alleged perpetrators accountable, even if substantial time had passed since the incidents occurred.
E. Jean Carroll’s case was one of the first high-profile lawsuits to take advantage of these changes in the law. It signifies a shift in the legal landscape and the increasing recognition of the importance of addressing historical sexual assault allegations and providing survivors with an opportunity to seek legal redress.
Jury Sides With Writer Who Says That Trump Sexually Abused Her
A jury found Donald Trump liable for the sexual abuse and defamation of E. Jean Carroll in a civil trial, but rejected her rape accusation. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll a total of $5 million in damages.